<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox Colour Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblog.bluedonkey.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblog.bluedonkey.org/?p=525</link>
	<description>Photos, Travel, Apple, Embedded Software, Wi-Fi and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 19:00:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asa Dotzler</title>
		<link>http://weblog.bluedonkey.org/?p=525&#038;cpage=1#comment-83902</link>
		<dc:creator>Asa Dotzler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.bluedonkey.org/?p=525#comment-83902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All there is to know about this issue:

http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2008/04/29/633/

- A]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All there is to know about this issue:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2008/04/29/633/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dria.org/wordpress/archives/2008/04/29/633/</a></p>
<p>- A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collusion Intrusion &#187; Blog Archive &#187; No Space for Color</title>
		<link>http://weblog.bluedonkey.org/?p=525&#038;cpage=1#comment-83889</link>
		<dc:creator>Collusion Intrusion &#187; Blog Archive &#187; No Space for Color</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.bluedonkey.org/?p=525#comment-83889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] quite make it to the the hex color of the rest of the footer. A quick Google and I found my solution. It appears that Safari, the only browser affected, honors color profiles. The way I understand it [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] quite make it to the the hex color of the rest of the footer. A quick Google and I found my solution. It appears that Safari, the only browser affected, honors color profiles. The way I understand it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Proofing</title>
		<link>http://weblog.bluedonkey.org/?p=525&#038;cpage=1#comment-65439</link>
		<dc:creator>Proofing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.bluedonkey.org/?p=525#comment-65439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;The proof is out there&lt;/strong&gt;

What is out there is full color printing. It has been around for some years now. Look around you and you will see the proof of its existence. If you are not yet convinced, maybe you can try comparing the kind of prints people had before with what is pr...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The proof is out there</strong></p>
<p>What is out there is full color printing. It has been around for some years now. Look around you and you will see the proof of its existence. If you are not yet convinced, maybe you can try comparing the kind of prints people had before with what is pr&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor Carpenter</title>
		<link>http://weblog.bluedonkey.org/?p=525&#038;cpage=1#comment-62273</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor Carpenter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 03:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.bluedonkey.org/?p=525#comment-62273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Firefox 3 will fix this...

http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/08/color-management-support-added-to-firefox-3/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox 3 will fix this&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/08/color-management-support-added-to-firefox-3/" rel="nofollow">http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2007/08/color-management-support-added-to-firefox-3/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sassomoso</title>
		<link>http://weblog.bluedonkey.org/?p=525&#038;cpage=1#comment-61963</link>
		<dc:creator>Sassomoso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.bluedonkey.org/?p=525#comment-61963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As of now, Safari is the only browser that supports color profiles and therefore displays correctly what you see in Photoshop, iPhoto/Aperture, etc. All other browsers are &quot;dumb&quot; and don&#039;t know what color profiles are and will just ignore them. There&#039;s a bit light at the end of the tunnel when FireFox 3.0 will be released, as it finally supports color profiles. IE? Well, maybe version 8 or 9 if you&#039;re lucky... not to mention that Microsoft finally got color profile handling done at OS level with Windows Vista (was implemented by Apple in the classic Mac OS decades ago).

The fact that not always the good things succeed with the majority, we&#039;re now looking at a web that&#039;s largely dominated by &quot;dumb&quot; browsers that can&#039;t handle color right. As a pain it is to say this but yes, you do have to adjust your monitor to the PC-Gamma and you have to adjust and export your images to sRGB and make them look good in a browser that CAN&#039;T handle color profiles :o(

For an explanation of why things are the way they are, read Apple&#039;s own support document (http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=302827) that further references a photographer&#039;s tutorial of how to calibrate and export for the web (http://www.gballard.net/psd/srgbforwww.html).

I hope this helps, as heartbreaking this may be... :o(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of now, Safari is the only browser that supports color profiles and therefore displays correctly what you see in Photoshop, iPhoto/Aperture, etc. All other browsers are &#8220;dumb&#8221; and don&#8217;t know what color profiles are and will just ignore them. There&#8217;s a bit light at the end of the tunnel when FireFox 3.0 will be released, as it finally supports color profiles. IE? Well, maybe version 8 or 9 if you&#8217;re lucky&#8230; not to mention that Microsoft finally got color profile handling done at OS level with Windows Vista (was implemented by Apple in the classic Mac OS decades ago).</p>
<p>The fact that not always the good things succeed with the majority, we&#8217;re now looking at a web that&#8217;s largely dominated by &#8220;dumb&#8221; browsers that can&#8217;t handle color right. As a pain it is to say this but yes, you do have to adjust your monitor to the PC-Gamma and you have to adjust and export your images to sRGB and make them look good in a browser that CAN&#8217;T handle color profiles <img src='http://weblog.bluedonkey.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> (</p>
<p>For an explanation of why things are the way they are, read Apple&#8217;s own support document (<a href="http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=302827" rel="nofollow">http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=302827</a>) that further references a photographer&#8217;s tutorial of how to calibrate and export for the web (<a href="http://www.gballard.net/psd/srgbforwww.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.gballard.net/psd/srgbforwww.html</a>).</p>
<p>I hope this helps, as heartbreaking this may be&#8230; <img src='http://weblog.bluedonkey.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> (</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
